Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
California RDA exam · Free practice questions
Five original RDA exam practice questions on diagnostic tests and records, each answered on this page with a rationale and a source.
Last updated 2026-07-25
Question 1 of 5
Answer D: The CAD imaging is an RDA duty; the final impression is an RDAEF extended function.
BPC §1752.4 expressly authorizes an RDA to obtain intraoral images for CAD-milled restorations under general supervision, while taking final impressions for permanent indirect restorations is an RDAEF extended function under BPC §1753.5.
Common trap: the exam blurs the two because both capture preparation geometry — the named CAD-imaging duty is the RDA's and nothing more.
Question 2 of 5
Answer B: Lawful, because using an automated caries detection device and recording the findings is an RDA duty under general supervision.
BPC §1752.4 expressly lists the use of automated caries detection devices and materials, and the recording of those findings, among the duties an RDA may perform under general supervision, and the Board's Table of Permitted Duties effective January 1, 2025 marks that duty G for RDAs. General supervision means the procedure is based on the dentist's instructions and does not require the dentist's physical presence, unlike direct supervision, which does. Running the device and recording numbers is data collection; the dentist still interprets the data.
Common trap: Option D confuses detecting with diagnosing — the device produces a reading, and only the dentist turns that reading into a diagnosis, so operating the device is delegable while the diagnosis is not. Option A applies the direct-supervision rule to a general-supervision duty, and option C invents an RDAEF requirement the statute does not impose.
Question 3 of 5
Answer B: Clean and dry the surface, then calibrate the unit per the manufacturer before reading.
Plaque, calculus, stain, and moisture all produce false readings on a laser fluorescence unit, which will report stain as though it were decay, so the standard procedure is to clean and dry the surface, calibrate or zero the device per the manufacturer, then read systematically and record the values by tooth and surface. An uncalibrated reading on a contaminated surface gives the dentist unreliable data to diagnose from.
Common trap: Option A is tempting because documenting the confounder feels diligent, but a knowingly unreliable reading is not a usable diagnostic record. Option D goes further and crosses the legal line — telling the patient a finding "means decay" is diagnosis, which no assistant category may perform.
Question 4 of 5
Answer B: The RDA — obtaining intraoral images for computer-aided design (CAD) milled restorations is its own named RDA duty under general supervision.
BPC §1752.4 names "obtaining intraoral images for computer-aided design (CAD), milled restorations" as an RDA duty, and the Board's Table of Permitted Duties effective January 1, 2025 marks it G, so the dentist's physical presence is not required. Final impressions for permanent indirect restorations sit in the RDAEF statute (BPC §1753.5), a different duty with a different license. The exam tests that these are two separately named authorities, not one blurred category.
Common trap: This is a stale-prep trap. Duty charts and study guides printed before January 1, 2025 misstate assisting scope and supervision levels, and many older materials collapse "scan" and "impression" into a single RDAEF-only line. The Board's 2025 table controls over any older chart.
Question 5 of 5
Answer A: A cold tip in warm breath fogged the optics and thin retraction let the cheek in — warm the tip, retract, and rescan.
Standard references identify moisture, patient or wand movement, optics fogging from a cold tip, inadequate retraction, a dirty or badly angled tip, missed areas, and strong ambient light as the recurring causes of an unusable digital scan. A poor scan produces a poor-fitting milled restoration, so the model is inspected for voids and distortions on screen and the deficient segment rescanned while the patient is still in the chair.
Common trap: Option C relies on outdated technique — some older systems required scanning powder, but most current systems are powder-free, so no powder is called for here. Option B inverts the light factor, since strong ambient light washes out a capture rather than improving it, and option D assumes software can invent surface data it never received.
Source: Bird DL, Robinson DS. Modern Dental Assisting. Current edition, Elsevier. (Record the exact edition in the source registry when first cited for a…
Free · no signup
The full free practice test samples every area and shows which ones to review first.
Take the free 15-question practice test