Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
California RDH Law & Ethics exam · Free practice questions
Five original RDH Law and Ethics practice questions on scope of practice, conduct and licensure, each answered on this page with a rationale and a source.
Last updated 2026-07-25
Question 1 of 5
Answer B: General supervision, which does not require the dentist on site, so the appointment may proceed.
California recognizes only two supervision levels for hygienists — direct (dentist physically present in the treatment facility) and general (dentist not required to be present) — and root planing is a general-supervision duty.
Common trap: "indirect supervision" does not exist in the Dental Hygiene Practice Act, and it is not the dental-assisting word either, since BPC § 1741(k)–(l) defines only direct and general supervision there too — so it is always a wrong answer here. It is not, however, "non-California" terminology: California defines indirect supervision in other licensed fields, such as veterinary practice under BPC § 4836.1. The accurate rule is that it is not a dental supervision level.
Question 2 of 5
Answer C: Fluoride varnish, which the statute allows without supervision in any setting.
fluoride varnish may be provided without supervision, in any setting, notwithstanding the general-supervision default.
Common trap: fluoride application and pit-and-fissure sealants go unsupervised only in a public health program, a sponsored event, or a nonprofit — this event is none of those.
Question 3 of 5
Answer A: Refuse, because only a licensed dentist, RDH, RDHAP, or RDHEF may lawfully practice dental hygiene.
no one other than a licensed dentist, RDH, RDHAP, or RDHEF may practice dental hygiene, including supragingival and subgingival scaling, and aiding or abetting an unlicensed person to practice is unprofessional conduct.
Common trap: the employer's responsibility never absorbs the licensee's — the hygienist who trains the unlicensed person is exposed personally.
Question 4 of 5
Answer B: The scaling and root planing, but not the local anesthesia, because that duty requires the dentist's physical presence.
California recognizes only two supervision levels for hygienists — "direct supervision," which requires the dentist to be "physically present in the treatment facility," and "general supervision," which does not. Local anesthesia is one of the three BPC § 1909 direct-supervision duties, so it stops the moment the dentist leaves the building. Scaling and root planing are BPC § 1910 general-supervision duties and continue on the dentist's prior instructions.
Common trap: Option D imports "indirect supervision," which appears nowhere in the Dental Hygiene Practice Act. Do not describe it as the dental-assisting term, either: BPC § 1741(k)–(l) defines only direct and general supervision for dental assisting as well. So "indirect" is not a dental supervision level in California and is always wrong on this exam — but do not overstate the point into "not a California term," because California defines indirect supervision in other licensed fields, including veterinary practice under BPC § 4836.1. Option A is tempting because the coursework requirement is satisfied, but § 1909 imposes two locks at once: the course and the dentist's physical presence. Option C over-corrects by treating every therapeutic procedure as direct-supervision when § 1912 makes general supervision the default for anything not specifically listed as direct.
Question 5 of 5
Answer C: Placing and carving the permanent composite restoration the dentist just prepared on tooth #19.
BPC § 1908 excludes from dental hygiene, at every license level and under any supervision, the "placing, condensing, carving, or removal of permanent restorations," along with diagnosis and comprehensive treatment planning, surgery or cutting on hard and soft tissue, prescribing medication, and anesthesia or sedation beyond nitrous oxide-oxygen and § 1909 local anesthesia. A hygiene assessment and hygiene care plan are expressly inside the scope, subgingival agents are a § 1910 general-supervision duty, and an interim therapeutic restoration is lawful under § 1910.5 precisely because it is a provisional restoration.
Common trap: Option B looks like the same act as option C to a candidate who does not separate "provisional" from "permanent" — an ITR stabilizes the tooth until a dentist diagnoses the need for definitive treatment, while a permanent restoration is one of the five doors that never opens. Option A trips candidates who blur a hygiene assessment and care plan (inside scope) with a diagnosis and comprehensive treatment plan (the dentist's alone).
Free · no signup
The full free practice test samples every area and shows which ones to review first.
Take the free 15-question practice test