Can a dental office appeal a Medicaid denial for the patient?

Only on two conditions, both in 42 CFR 438.402(c)(1)(ii): state law must permit a provider to act on an enrollee's behalf, and the enrollee must give written consent. The same paragraph carves out continuation of benefits, which the enrollee has to request personally and on a much shorter clock.

Is a provider payment dispute the same as an appeal?

No, and treating it as one is the common error. Subpart F governs the enrollee's challenge to an adverse benefit determination. A payment, pricing, recoupment, or contract dispute runs on the managed-care contract and the state program rules, with its own deadlines and often its own form.

Billing & claims · Last verified 2026-08-31

Medicaid managed care - enrollee appeal or provider dispute: letter generator

Independent publisher · Drafted with AI assistance, verified against primary sources · Credentialed review pending

Two different letters: the enrollee's appeal, which needs written consent, and the practice's own payment dispute, which is not an appeal at all.

Plan type: State Medicaid dental managed care plan (MCO, PIHP, or PAHP).

Enrollee appeal window: 60 calendar days; 42 CFR 438.402 (eCFR, current text)
Plan resolution ceiling: 30 calendar days (+14); 42 CFR 438.408 (eCFR, current text)
Fair hearing request window: 90 to 120 calendar days, state-set; 42 CFR 438.408 (eCFR, current text)
Provider standing: State law permits + written consent; 42 CFR 438.402 (eCFR, current text)
Last verified: 2026-08-31

Who is writing

The enrollee's appeal, filed by this office with written consent42 CFR 438.402(c)(1)(ii): only if state law permits, and only with the enrollee's written consent.The practice's own payment or contract disputeNot a subpart F appeal. Follows the managed-care contract and state program rules.

The enrollee's signed written consent is in hand and will be attached to this letter.Until you tick this, the letter claims no enclosure and the enclosure list carries an attach-before-sending instruction in its place.What the notice saysAn adverse benefit determination under 42 CFR 438.400(b)(1).StateOnly states verified this pass appear. A state's absence means it was not checked, not that it has no rule.

Paragraphs you can switch off

The plan's resolution clock42 CFR 438.408(a), (b)(2), (c)(1)What comes after this appeal42 CFR 438.408(f)(1) and (f)(2); 438.402(c)(1)(i)Deemed exhaustion on a missed notice or deadline42 CFR 438.402(c)(1)(i)(A)

Additional facts, in your own words (optional)Passed through verbatim and labeled as the treating office's own words. Never stored, never sent anywhere, and never used to generate anything. Do not type patient identifiers here.

Before this letter can be sent

Two conditions, both required: state law must permit a provider to act, and the enrollee's written consent must be signed and attached. Providers cannot request continuation of benefits even with consent.

6 paragraphs included — 2 withheld — written as the enrollee's appeal, filed by this office with written consent

[PRACTICE NAME]
[PRACTICE ADDRESS]
[PRACTICE PHONE]

[DATE]

[PLAN NAME] - Appeals / Provider Dispute Department
[APPEALS ADDRESS FROM THE NOTICE]

Re: Appeal of an adverse benefit determination - Medicaid managed care

Patient: [PATIENT NAME] - DOB: [DATE OF BIRTH]
Member/subscriber ID: [MEMBER ID] - Plan: [PLAN NAME]
Claim number: [CLAIM NUMBER] - Date(s) of service: [DATE OF SERVICE]
Procedure code(s): [PROCEDURE CODES] - Amount billed: [BILLED AMOUNT]
Denial notice dated: [DATE OF DENIAL NOTICE] - Denial code(s): [DENIAL CODES]

This letter concerns the Medicaid dental claim identified above and the determination issued by notice dated [DATE OF DENIAL NOTICE]. This office files this appeal on behalf of the enrollee under 42 CFR 438.402(c)(1)(ii), which permits it only where state law allows and with the enrollee's written consent. The notice denies or limits authorization of a requested service, including the type or level of service.

The determination described above is an adverse benefit determination within 42 CFR 438.400(b), and this letter is a request for appeal of that determination under 42 CFR 438.402.

This office acts under 42 CFR 438.402(c)(1)(ii), which permits a provider to request an appeal on an enrollee's behalf where state law permits and with the enrollee's written consent. This office is not requesting continuation of benefits, which the same paragraph reserves to the enrollee.

This appeal is filed within the 60 calendar days that 42 CFR 438.402(c)(2)(ii) allows from the date on the adverse benefit determination notice, which is dated [DATE OF DENIAL NOTICE].

42 CFR 438.408(a) and (b)(2) require the plan to resolve this appeal as expeditiously as the enrollee's health condition requires and no later than 30 calendar days from receipt, extendable by up to 14 calendar days under paragraph (c)(1). Please confirm the date the decision is due.

If the plan upholds the determination, please state in the notice of resolution the enrollee's right to request a state fair hearing and the deadline for doing so. Under 42 CFR 438.408(f)(1) that right arises only after this appeal is decided, and paragraph (f)(2) sets the state's request window at no less than 90 and no more than 120 calendar days from the notice of resolution.

For the record: under 42 CFR 438.402(c)(1)(i)(A), where the plan fails to adhere to the notice and timing requirements in 42 CFR 438.408, the enrollee is deemed to have exhausted the plan's appeals process and may initiate a state fair hearing.

Please confirm in writing the date this was received, the date the decision is due, and the name and credentials of the reviewer. Where the determination is upheld, please state the reason, the specific rule or contract provision relied on, and the next level of review with its deadline.

Enclosures:
- Copy of the notice of adverse benefit determination or remittance dated [DATE OF DENIAL NOTICE]
- Copy of the claim as submitted, with attachments
- ATTACH BEFORE SENDING: signed written consent from the enrollee authorizing this office to appeal on the enrollee's behalf

Sincerely,

[PROVIDER NAME, CREDENTIALS]
[PRACTICE NAME] - NPI [NPI] - Tax ID [TAX ID]

Before sending: read this letter against the denial notice and the patient's plan documents, replace every bracketed placeholder, and confirm the filing deadline and address printed on the notice itself.

Not in this letter

The dispute route is the contract's, not subpart F's — only in the "The practice's own payment or contract dispute" route.
The outcome requested — only in the "The practice's own payment or contract dispute" route.

A paragraph that does not apply is left out, never swapped for a weaker one.

A shared link carries the four selections only — never your words and never a patient detail. Every identifier stays a bracketed placeholder you fill inside your own practice-management system.

How this letter is assembled

Every paragraph is a fixed string in this repository, written against one cited provision and carrying that citation on the page. The generator chooses which paragraphs apply to your selections, orders them, and joins them — it writes nothing of its own, draws no conclusion about your claim, and never softens or substitutes a paragraph whose conditions are not met. Where a paragraph does not apply it is listed as withheld, with the reason.

Citations were verified 2026-08-31 against the regulation, statute, or payer document linked beside each element. Provider contracts and plan documents override published manuals, so confirm the deadline and address on the notice you actually received.

Nothing you type here leaves your browser — the results are computed locally on this page.

The letter generator runs entirely in your browser — enable JavaScript to use it. Every element it can carry, with its citation and its exact letter text, is listed below in plain HTML.

When to use this letter

A state Medicaid dental plan denied, reduced, suspended, or terminated a service, or denied payment in whole or in part, and the enrollee wants it appealed.
The practice has the enrollee's written consent and state law permits a provider to act on the enrollee's behalf.
The practice's own claim was underpaid or denied and you need the contract-based dispute route rather than an appeal.

When not to

The plan is a commercial or self-funded plan - those routes are separate letters here.
You want continuation of benefits. Providers cannot request it; the enrollee must, on a much shorter clock.
The payment denial is solely for failure to meet the clean-claim definition, which is not an adverse benefit determination.

Every element this letter can carry, and the provision behind it

A paragraph with no citation is marked as a request rather than an entitlement, because that is what it is.

Element	What the rule gives	Authority and scope
This is an adverse benefit determinationAlways included	42 CFR 438.400(b) defines an adverse benefit determination to include the denial or limited authorization of a requested service, the reduction, suspension, or termination of a previously authorized service, and the denial in whole or in part of payment for a service. The definition has seven prongs in all, and a payment denial solely for failure to meet the clean-claim definition is not one of them.	42 CFR 438.400(b)(b), definitions (1)-(3) of sevenMedicaid managed care organizations, PIHPs, and PAHPs. Non-emergency medical transportation PAHPs are exempt from subpart F entirely.
Written consent and state-law permissionAlways included	If state law permits and with the written consent of the enrollee, a provider or an authorized representative may request an appeal or file a grievance, or request a state fair hearing, on behalf of an enrollee.	42 CFR 438.402(c)(1)(ii)(c)(1)(ii)Both conditions are required. The same paragraph excepts continuation of benefits, which a provider cannot request.
Filed within the 60-day windowAlways included	An enrollee has 60 calendar days from the date on the adverse benefit determination notice in which to file a request for an appeal to the managed care plan.	42 CFR 438.402(c)(2)(ii)(c)(2)(ii)The federal clock runs from the date on the notice. Some state manuals measure from the enrollee's receipt of it - quote whichever governs your route.
The plan's resolution clock	The plan must resolve a standard appeal as expeditiously as the enrollee's health condition requires and within a timeframe no longer than 30 calendar days from receipt, extendable by up to 14 calendar days at the enrollee's request or where the plan justifies a delay in the enrollee's interest.	42 CFR 438.408(a), (b)(2), (c)(1)(a); (b)(2); (c)(1)The 30 days is a ceiling on a state-established timeframe, not a floor.
What comes after this appeal	An enrollee may request a state fair hearing only after receiving notice that the plan is upholding the adverse benefit determination, and the state sets the request window at no less than 90 and no more than 120 calendar days from the plan's notice of resolution.	42 CFR 438.408(f)(1) and (f)(2); 438.402(c)(1)(i)(f)(1); (f)(2); 438.402(c)(1)(i)A state may also offer an optional external medical review, which cannot be required before the fair hearing or used to deter it.
Deemed exhaustion on a missed notice or deadline	Where the plan fails to adhere to the notice and timing requirements of 42 CFR 438.408, the enrollee is deemed to have exhausted the plan's appeals process and may initiate a state fair hearing.	42 CFR 438.402(c)(1)(i)(A)(c)(1)(i)(A); mirrored at 438.408(c)(3) and (f)(1)(i)Medicaid managed care.
The dispute route is the contract's, not subpart F'sAlways included	A provider's payment, pricing, recoupment, or contract dispute follows the managed-care contract and the state's Medicaid program rules. The federal enrollee-appeal rules do not create a provider payment-dispute process, and their deadlines do not govern one.	42 CFR 438.402(c)(1)(ii), by exclusion(c)(1)(ii) - provider standing exists only for the enrollee's appealThe state layer supplies the real deadline: Texas HHSC requires a 30-calendar-day resolution of provider complaints; Ohio gives 30 calendar days after exhaustion to request External Medical Review.
The outcome requested	State the outcome asked for, so the plan cannot treat the letter as correspondence.	No citation — a request, not an entitlementStructural.

Read this before sending

Providers cannot request continuation of benefits

42 CFR 438.402(c)(1)(ii) excepts continuation of benefits from what a consented provider may request; the enrollee has to file for it. The clock is also different from the appeal clock and much shorter: continuation must be requested by the later of 10 calendar days after the plan sends the notice or the intended effective date, and 438.420(b) requires all five conditions - a timely appeal, a termination, suspension, or reduction of a previously authorized service, services ordered by an authorized provider, an unexpired original authorization period, and a timely continuation request. If the final decision is adverse the plan may recover the cost of the continued services, consistent with the state's usual recovery policy and the contract.

42 CFR 438.420 (eCFR, current text)42 CFR 438.402 (eCFR, current text)

A clean-claim denial is not an adverse benefit determination

The definition at 42 CFR 438.400(b) has seven prongs, not three - it also reaches untimely service provision, a plan's failure to meet the resolution timeframes, rural one-MCO out-of-network denials, and financial-liability disputes. But a denial of payment solely because the claim did not meet the clean-claim definition at 42 CFR 447.45(b) is expressly not an adverse benefit determination, so it is a payment dispute rather than an appeal.

42 CFR 438.400 (eCFR, current text)

Two carve-outs from subpart F

Non-emergency medical transportation PAHPs are exempt from subpart F entirely, and applicable integrated plans - dual-eligible special needs plans - follow 42 CFR 422.629 through 422.634 instead of these rules.

42 CFR 438.402 (eCFR, current text)

The state layer, not the federal rule, sets a provider's deadline

Federal law gives the 60-day clock to the enrollee. A practice's own dispute runs on the plan contract and the state program: Texas HHSC requires its dental contractor to resolve provider complaints within 30 calendar days and the contractors' claim-appeal windows run 120 days from different instruments; Ohio's External Medical Review is 30 calendar days after the plan's internal process is exhausted, medical necessity only; California runs a Claim Inquiry Form at six months before a 90-day appeal from the EOB. Read the state note below for the route you are on, then read the contract.

HHSC Dental Services Contract No. HHS0002879, Attachment A CareSource Provider Manual - Ohio Medicaid Medi-Cal Dental Provider Handbook, Section 2

State notes: where the real deadline lives

The federal 60-day clock belongs to the enrollee. A practice's own dispute runs on the plan contract and the state program, and those differ by state and by plan.

Texas

Provider complaints are on HHSC's contract clock; claim appeals are on the contractor's.

Enrollee appeal: Both Texas dental contractors run the consented enrollee appeal at 60 days, though they measure it from the member's receipt of the notice of action while the federal rule measures it from the date on the notice. Quote whichever one governs the route you are on.

Provider dispute: HHSC's own Dental Services Contract requires the Dental Contractor to resolve provider complaints within 30 calendar days of receipt. Claim appeals run 120 days, but keyed to different instruments by route: DentaQuest measures from the date of disposition of the Explanation of Benefits, MCNA from its initial claim determination, and traditional fee-for-service from the disposition date on the R&S Report.

There is no 30-day window to file after a reconsideration determination. In both contractor manuals the 30 days is the payer's own deadline to answer. The only genuine 30-day filing clock found is DentaQuest's credentialing appeal, which is about network termination, not claim payment.
MCNA runs reconsiderations (administrative denials) and appeals (medical necessity and benefit coverage) as two separate tracks, both at 120 days. DentaQuest's manual has no claims reconsideration track at all.
DentaQuest requires its complaint process to be exhausted before filing with HHSC; MCNA tells providers they may file directly with HHSC.
MCNA's manual states 30 working days for provider complaint resolution where the HHSC contract says 30 calendar days.
CHIP is a different regime: the contract requires provider complaints and claims payment appeals resolved within 30 calendar days, and CHIP disputes route to the Texas Department of Insurance rather than HHSC.

HHSC Dental Services Contract No. HHS0002879, Attachment A DentaQuest, TX HHSC Dental Services Provider Office Reference Manual v9.6 MCNA Dental Provider Manual: Texas Medicaid and CHIP

Florida

Dental is carved out to the dental plans, and a medical plan's clock does not govern a dental claim.

Enrollee appeal: AHCA states that an adverse benefit determination must be made within 7 days and may be appealed by the enrollee within 60 days, and that the state fair hearing follows 120 days after the plan appeal. That 60-day figure is AHCA's program-level statement; confirm it against the notice of adverse benefit determination the enrollee actually received.

Provider dispute: Use the plan's own provider complaint process first, then escalate to AHCA. AHCA states that where the issue involves a Medicaid managed care plan the provider should use the plan's process before submitting a complaint to the Agency, and that complaints are worked by the urgency of the reported issue rather than the order received. The Medicaid Helpline is 1-877-254-1055.

Only DentaQuest and LIBERTY hold 2025-2030 Florida SMMC dental contracts. MCNA appears only on the superseded 2018-2024 roster, which is still linked from AHCA's own pages - check the As of stamp before trusting an agency PDF.
A medical plan's filing clocks do not govern a dentist's Florida Medicaid dental claim: dental is carved out to the separate dental plans under their own provider manuals.
Continuation of benefits runs on a 10-day clock, not the 60-day appeal clock: no later than 10 days after the unfavorable notice was mailed, or on or before the first day services are scheduled to be reduced.
One Florida plan manual read for this pass says a member may file a grievance or appeal at any time, which contradicts AHCA's 60-day statement. Attribute the 60 days to AHCA and confirm against the plan's notice.

AHCA, SMMC Program Snapshot: Process for Enrollee Grievances and Appeals AHCA, SMMC Plan Poster (as of 02-04-2025)AHCA, Florida Medicaid providers: how to file a complaint

Ohio

After the plan's internal step, a medical-necessity denial goes to External Medical Review.

Provider dispute: A provider who has exhausted an Ohio Medicaid managed care plan's internal appeal or claim-dispute process has 30 calendar days from the written notice that the process is complete to request an External Medical Review with Permedion, now a Gainwell Technologies business. A provider who skips the internal step has no EMR right at all.

Medical necessity only: services denied for reasons other than lack of medical necessity, where no clinical review was completed, are not subject to External Medical Review.
Program carve-outs: EMR is not available for MyCare Ohio, the Single Pharmacy Benefit Manager, or fee-for-service Medicaid. It covers Medicaid managed care and OhioRISE.
There is an earliest as well as a latest: a provider may not request EMR before the plan's 30-business-day dispute-review standard has run, but is not required to file at that mark either.
Outcome asymmetry: a reversal is final and binding on the plan; an affirmance is final, with no further provider appeal layer.
Plan filing windows are the plan's own, not a statewide rule. One Ohio Medicaid plan requires provider claim disputes, clinical and non-clinical, within 12 months (365 calendar days) of the date of service or 60 calendar days after payment, denial, or partial denial of a timely claim submission, whichever is later - the whichever-is-later half matters, and Ohio's separate 365-day figure is the claim timely-filing limit under OAC 5160-1-19(D)(1)(a), a different clock.
No Ohio Administrative Code rule codifies the EMR process; the right and its 30-day clock live in the Next Generation Medicaid Managed Care provider agreement.

CareSource Provider Manual - Ohio Medicaid (ODM approved 10/24/2025)Buckeye Health Plan, External Medical Review (EMR)

California

Medi-Cal Dental runs on the Claim Inquiry Form first, then a 90-day appeal from the EOB.

Enrollee appeal: A state hearing request is due within 90 days after the order or action complained of for fee-for-service. For a member enrolled in a Medi-Cal managed care plan the sequence differs: appeal the adverse benefit determination to the plan first, then request the hearing within 120 calendar days.

Provider dispute: The provider's first step is a Claim Inquiry Form within six calendar months of the Explanation of Benefits date. The first-level appeal is a letter to Medi-Cal Dental within 90 days of the EOB denial date - not a CIF, and not measured from a RAD. DHCS acknowledges within 21 calendar days, issues findings within 30 days, and may take up to 60 days where the matter is referred to Professional Review. After that, a writ of mandate under Welfare and Institutions Code section 14104.5 is the exclusive remedy, within one year.

Nothing about a late appeal is automatic: the handbook states no automatic denial for a late appeal, and DHCS carries affirmative response duties instead.
RAD is Medi-Cal medical fiscal-intermediary vocabulary, not Medi-Cal Dental vocabulary. Medi-Cal Dental runs on EOB, CIF, and NOA.
Billing limits are tiered rather than a cliff: six calendar months pays 100 percent of the state maximum allowance, seven to nine months 75 percent, ten to twelve months 50 percent.
A late claim is not necessarily a dead claim - Title 22 section 51008 lists good-cause extensions to one year from the date of service.
Providers are prohibited from billing a Medi-Cal member directly for covered services except an applicable co-pay; under the Conlan v. Shewry route the Department reimburses the member and recoups from the provider, and additional sanctions may be imposed. Claims under that route are due within 60 days of the date on the letter, with the six-month billing limit waived.
The Medi-Cal Dental Provider Handbook is re-issued monthly, so re-check any pinpoint at the time you rely on it.

Medi-Cal Dental Provider Handbook, Section 2 Program Overview (rev. September 2026)Medi-Cal Dental Provider Handbook, Section 4 Treating Members (rev. September 2026)Cal. Welfare and Institutions Code section 10951 (leginfo)

New York

Plan appeal first at 60 days, then 120 calendar days to the fair hearing.

Enrollee appeal: An enrollee has 60 calendar days from the date of the initial adverse determination notice to ask for a plan appeal. A standard plan appeal decision is due within 30 calendar days; a fast-track appeal within 2 working days and no more than 72 hours. After a Final Adverse Determination, the enrollee has 120 calendar days to ask for a state fair hearing through the Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance.

The 30-day plan-appeal clock is extendable: where the plan needs more information it decides no later than 14 days from the day it asked.
Aid-continuing has its own 10-day trigger, separate from the 120-day filing window.
The 120 days is Medicaid-managed-care specific. New York's general fair-hearing statute is 60 days from the action complained of; never generalize the 120.
Where an enrollee asks for both a fair hearing and an external appeal, the fair hearing officer's decision is the one that counts.

NYSDOH Medicaid Managed Care Model Member Handbook (rev. 8/19/2025)

Every identifier stays a placeholder

There is no input anywhere in this tool for a patient name, a member ID, a claim number, or a date. The letter emits these tokens and you fill them inside your own practice-management system.

[DATE] — Today's date
[APPEALS ADDRESS FROM THE NOTICE] — Appeals address, exactly as printed on the denial notice
[PRACTICE NAME] — Practice name
[PRACTICE ADDRESS] — Practice address
[PRACTICE PHONE] — Practice phone
[PATIENT NAME] — Patient or enrollee name
[DATE OF BIRTH] — Date of birth
[MEMBER ID] — Member or subscriber ID
[PLAN NAME] — Plan or group name
[CLAIM NUMBER] — Claim number
[DATE OF SERVICE] — Date(s) of service
[PROCEDURE CODES] — Procedure codes billed
[BILLED AMOUNT] — Amount billed
[DATE OF DENIAL NOTICE] — Date on the denial notice
[DENIAL CODES] — Denial codes from the remittance
[PROVIDER NAME, CREDENTIALS] — Treating provider
[NPI] — Provider NPI
[TAX ID] — Practice tax ID

Common questions

Can a dental office appeal a Medicaid denial for the patient?: Only on two conditions, both in 42 CFR 438.402(c)(1)(ii): state law must permit a provider to act on an enrollee's behalf, and the enrollee must give written consent. The same paragraph carves out continuation of benefits, which the enrollee has to request personally and on a much shorter clock.
How long does a Medicaid managed care plan have to decide?: A standard appeal must be resolved as expeditiously as the enrollee's health condition requires and no later than 30 calendar days from receipt, extendable by up to 14 calendar days at the enrollee's request or where the plan justifies the delay in the enrollee's interest - 42 CFR 438.408(a), (b)(2), (c)(1).
Is a provider payment dispute the same as an appeal?: No, and treating it as one is the common error. Subpart F governs the enrollee's challenge to an adverse benefit determination. A payment, pricing, recoupment, or contract dispute runs on the managed-care contract and the state program rules, with its own deadlines and often its own form.

What these generators will not do - on purpose

They do not give legal advice. These are document-assembly tools: they place text you select into a letter you review, sign, and send. They do not apply legal judgment to your situation, and nothing here is a legal opinion about your claim, your contract, or your rights.
They make no claim about whether an appeal will succeed. There is no success rate on this page, no estimate of recovery, and no promise that a letter changes an outcome. Anyone quoting one to you should be asked for the evidence behind it.
They never ask for patient information. Names, birth dates, member IDs, claim numbers, and dates render as bracketed placeholders you fill in inside your own practice-management system. Nothing you type here leaves your browser.
They will not promise a route that does not exist. Federal external review does not attach to a standalone dental plan; Illinois excludes dental-only policies from its external-review Act; New Jersey's arbitration program excludes dental service corporations and dental plan organizations. Where a route is closed, the page says so instead of filling the gap.
They will not tell you your contract loses to a manual. Every payer here says the opposite: the provider agreement or applicable law supersedes the published guide. Published windows are the payer's public statement; the number in your contract controls.
The boundary of legal practice is a state question. The ABA recommended in August 2003 that every state adopt its own definition of the practice of law, on the basic premise that practising law is the application of legal principles and judgment to the circumstances or objectives of another person or entity, and left to each state who may provide those services. Its report also notes that drafting and selecting legal documents inherently involves legal advice. That is why these tools assemble and cite rather than advise - and why a state-specific question belongs with a licensed attorney in that state.

ABA Task Force on the Model Definition of the Practice of Law ABA Task Force, Report to the House of Delegates (August 2003)

Sources

42 CFR 438.400 (eCFR, current text) — (b) adverse benefit determination
42 CFR 438.402 (eCFR, current text) — (a); (c)(1)(i)-(ii); (c)(2)(ii)
42 CFR 438.408 (eCFR, current text) — (a); (b)(2); (c)(1); (c)(3); (f)(1)-(2)
42 CFR 438.420 (eCFR, current text) — (a); (b)(1)-(5); (d)
HHSC Dental Services Contract No. HHS0002879, Attachment A — Section 1.5.2.1
CareSource Provider Manual - Ohio Medicaid — External Medical Review, printed p. 65
Medi-Cal Dental Provider Handbook, Section 2 — Provider First-Level Appeals, p. 2-12

Pro tier interest list

AI note-to-narrative drafting and multi-location features are being considered for a Pro tier — leave an email to hear if they ship.